You are currently viewing Why TNA Is Not the #2 Promotion in the World — And What Must Change for the AMC Era to Matter

Why TNA Is Not the #2 Promotion in the World — And What Must Change for the AMC Era to Matter

When TNA Wrestling announced its move to AMC, many fans — myself included — allowed themselves to feel hopeful again. Hopeful that a promotion with such a rich history, one that once redefined alternatives in North American wrestling, could finally stabilize, modernize, and re-establish itself as a serious player in 2026.

Instead, the AMC debut only magnified what fans, critics, and even talent have been saying for years: TNA’s problems are not about exposure — they are about execution, identity, creative direction, and long-term vision.

This is not a reactionary take. It is the cumulative result of fan discourse across wrestling social media, critical analysis from credible wrestling media, backstage reporting, and what we are seeing play out on television week after week.


The AMC Debut: Visibility Without Impact

The move to AMC should have been transformational. Network television demands polish, urgency, and clarity of purpose. What viewers got instead was a show widely criticized for uneven pacing, weak production, and a lack of compelling, conversation-driving moments.

Industry voices pointed to dated presentation and questionable directing decisions, with some describing the episode as feeling more like an infomercial than a modern wrestling broadcast. That perception matters. Wrestling today competes not just with other promotions, but with high-end episodic television. If the product looks minor league, it will be treated as such.

More telling was the reported backstage sentiment: talent understood the debut did not deliver at the level required. That honesty confirms the issues are systemic, not circumstantial.


Creative Direction: The Core Structural Failure

At the center of TNA’s struggles is creative direction — or the lack of a cohesive, long-term creative philosophy.

There is growing scrutiny surrounding Tommy Dreamer and Delirious and whether they are equipped to guide a modern weekly television product. This criticism is not personal, nor is it dismissive of their careers. It is results-based.

Inconsistent storytelling, rushed title programs, shallow character arcs, and momentum that stalls almost immediately after it is created have become recurring patterns. Wrestling in 2026 must function like serialized television. That requires leadership that understands escalation, payoff, and narrative continuity — not just match placement.

TNA is a television show first. Until creative is structured with that reality in mind, the product will continue to feel unfocused and disposable.


Bright Spots Undermined by Poor Planning

Despite its issues, TNA does have legitimate bright spots. Leon Slater and Dani Luna were clearly being positioned as foundational pieces of the company’s future before ongoing visa issues abruptly halted their momentum.

Slater, in particular, represents what TNA should be building around: young, athletic, charismatic, and presented with intent as X-Division Champion. However, visa complications — while sometimes unavoidable — exposed a deeper operational flaw. You cannot anchor major television plans around talent whose availability is not fully secured.

When key performers disappear without narrative resolution, it erodes viewer trust and damages long-term storytelling.


Men’s Tag Team Division: Directionless by Design

The men’s tag division serves as a case study in TNA’s broader creative issues.

Signing The Righteous was a strong move. Immediately positioning them for championship contention was not. New teams need time to establish identity through meaningful feuds before entering title programs.

Meanwhile, The Hardys’ extended reign as tag team champions has become a lightning rod for criticism. Fan sentiment has been clear: this reign has not elevated the division, created new stars, or injected urgency. The championships should be used to build the future, not preserve nostalgia.

Beyond The Hardys, The Righteous, The Great Hands, The Andersons (C.W. and Brock), and the Eddie Edwards and Brian Myers pairing, the division lacks depth and freshness — a direct result of roster stagnation and short-term thinking.


The Knockouts Division: Overbooked, Undermined, and Thin

Once the industry benchmark for women’s wrestling, the Knockouts Division now feels creatively cluttered and structurally shallow.

The Elegance Brand, positioned as a top heel faction, has drifted away from sophistication into exaggerated, occasionally comedic territory. Comparisons to the early Beautiful People era are unavoidable, particularly with the introduction of “Mr. Elegance,” but imitation without evolution weakens credibility.

Opposite them stands The Diamond Collective, consisting of Tessa Blanchard, Victoria Crawford, and one of TNA’s newest Knockouts, Mila Moore. Moore’s inclusion is clearly defined on television and in match results, and her alignment gives the faction youthful upside. However, the group’s overall direction has stalled.

Blanchard returned with nuclear heat and initially felt important after defeating Jordynne Grace and challenging for the Knockouts World Championship. Since then, both Blanchard and Crawford have slid into mentor-adjacent roles with little meaningful progression, leaving the faction underutilized relative to its potential.

Depth remains the division’s most pressing issue. TNA’s reliance on NXT talent — highlighted by a recent NXT main event determining Knockouts World Tag Team Championship contenders — underscores how thin the roster truly is. With Lei Ying Lee already holding the Knockouts World Championship, the idea of double champions raises more structural questions than it answers.

And hovering over all of this is the unexplained absence of Rosemary, one of the longest-tenured and most versatile performers in company history, from any meaningful creative direction.


Roster Instability and Short-Term Vision

Another unavoidable reality is that TNA’s roster lacks long-term commitment.

Short-term contracts, talent splitting time with independent promotions, and performers missing tapings create constant narrative disruption. Wrestling thrives on consistency. Without it, stories fail to resonate and characters fail to connect.

Long-term contracts are not optional if TNA wants to build stars rather than recycle moments.


Production: Perception Shapes Reality

No matter how strong the in-ring talent may be, television presentation dictates perception. Camera work, lighting, audio, and directing shape how wrestling is received.

The AMC debut made it clear that TNA must invest in experienced broadcast directors and production teams. Modern audiences are visually sophisticated. If the show looks dated or poorly produced, they tune out — and rarely return.


An Identity Crisis in Plain Sight

Perhaps the most damaging critique is that TNA no longer feels distinctly like TNA.

The ongoing partnership with WWE and NXT provides exposure, but it also risks positioning TNA as supplementary rather than essential. Too often, the product feels like a collection of borrowed aesthetics rather than a fully realized alternative with its own voice.

A promotion cannot be viewed as #2 without a clear, unapologetic identity.


The Path Forward: A Necessary Reset

If the AMC era is going to matter, incremental change will not be enough.

  • A complete creative overhaul focused on television storytelling
  • Bringing back credible leadership voices — particularly Gail Kim — in authoritative creative and talent-development roles
  • Locking down the roster with long-term contracts
  • Rebuilding both tag divisions with depth and purpose
  • Investing heavily in production, directing, and presentation
  • Committing to younger, hungry talent as the foundation of the future

Final Word

AMC gave TNA opportunity — not legitimacy. Legitimacy must be earned.

Right now, fans and critics are not being unfair. They are being honest.

TNA will not be viewed as the #2 promotion in the world until it stops chasing familiarity and starts committing fully to its own identity — with disciplined creative leadership, roster stability, modern production, and storytelling that rewards weekly investment.

The potential is real.
The history is undeniable.

What remains unanswered is whether TNA is willing to make the hard decisions necessary to finally move forward.


Make sure to subscribe to our Late Night Crew Wrestling YouTube Channel. Follow @yorkjavon@kspowerwheels & @LateNightCrewYT on X.

Leave a Reply